As a counter thought, would it be right for players that haven't played in the qualifying games being eligble for the final? Does having no qualification make the Shield prone to a team winning with an asterisk (if it hasn't already in the past)?
The AFL can allow a player on a list to play without playing a game (think Marlion Pickett) but as the Shield is essentially treated as Test Reserve grade should it adopt a policy more in line with club cricket where the 3s side can't be stacked?
It’s a good point John. Mitch has barely played for WA in recent years and Cam’s been absent on national duties. It would be unfair on those who missed out to some degree, but so much better for the competition to have the big names playing. It’s a step too far to block cricketers from IPL totally but surely asking them to miss a couple of games because of a First Class final is not too much to ask.
As a counter thought, would it be right for players that haven't played in the qualifying games being eligble for the final? Does having no qualification make the Shield prone to a team winning with an asterisk (if it hasn't already in the past)?
The AFL can allow a player on a list to play without playing a game (think Marlion Pickett) but as the Shield is essentially treated as Test Reserve grade should it adopt a policy more in line with club cricket where the 3s side can't be stacked?
It’s a good point John. Mitch has barely played for WA in recent years and Cam’s been absent on national duties. It would be unfair on those who missed out to some degree, but so much better for the competition to have the big names playing. It’s a step too far to block cricketers from IPL totally but surely asking them to miss a couple of games because of a First Class final is not too much to ask.
For me the footy season doesn't start until the Shield Final is decided.
Great to see your writings here
You’ve had this one up your sleeve for a minute ay Pete 😂